Our privacy

Today i had to write a post :"Cloud : the mist over our privacy" but they happened lots of things and the "file rouge" of these is "our privacy"...

so this video tells better than thousands of words... ...

You Have to be Worried!!!

A future where the hardware will be the Human Being

Deux-ex : Revolution is a good FPS that tells about actions of  an ex-policeman with IT implants to help him to fight for example with a sight in augmented reality.

It provides a vision of future when human body will be the better hardware.

Developers have imagined a situation of these human devices will be only for people with money to buy medicines to block the answer of immune system.

And this is a good connection to introduce our post.

The most discussed device in this moment is Google Glass than is able to provide an AR (augmented reality) experience while you watch a TV, while you walk or run, because the information is in front of you like an HUD (Head-up Display in videogames is the sight on the screen with info as points life, radar etc etc) and you will can to give commands just to move your eyes.
 

 HUD of Adam Jensen , protagonist of Deus-Ex

 Wuahhuuuuuu!!!!!!!!!

It's incredible,  it's the future, it's what i want... Change TV channel in the dark night when all couches are dark ... and we shout “F***, where is the Remote Control?"

Another fascinating research concerns the use of the human body to transport data between devices as portable hard-disks or phones.

From BBC news

We are very close to buy a headphone that sends the sound through the human bones.

From Wikipedia

We can imagine thousands of others similar innovation, but we must to think how these will become better our lives and how will be a risk for our health.

Today no one definitively is able to say if mobile phone and wireless waves are a risk of our health , we know the problem of watching video 3D for long time or simple a risk of exposition to psychedelic video for some susceptible people, but the interaction between human body and devices it's a potential great risk.

How it's possible to accept technology more invasive without ask questions?

Some months ago i read a news about risk of to assume wrong posture for children using Tablet and smartphone, if there is a risk only for use of a device, there isn't a risk in the use of our body as device?

What do you want change of your body and brain?

Unfortunately i am not a doctor, so i don't want to say only my impressions but i would to have pleasure to introduce comments of expert of medicine that can provide some interesting and scientific information.

anybody here?

The Big Data, an IT Big Brother?

I woke up today with my phone alarm (something knows this).

I connected with my tablet (something knows this).

I went to work with my car and i payed a fuel with credit card (something knows where i'm, when, my bank account and how much I spend ).

I used my badge on the work (something knows where i'm and when).

Every moment of my life today generates info and these info are stored by my bank, by my company, by e-mail server, by Apple or Google or Microsoft.

I can suspect also by some G-men...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/may/04/telephone-calls-recorded-fbi-boston/print

If I pay my shopping with credit card , my bank only knows how much i spend, but don't knows what I exactly have in my hands.

If I use a shopping card to have discounts, the supermarket only knows what I buy and this is useful to propose to me other discounts or promotion goods.

Ok, it's a problem? Not , absolutely.

But if a company or an agency can collect every info about my life, my account, my phone, my friends, what i eat, what i watch on tv and on internet, what i buy and what i sell, when and where I am, if i'm heterosexual or omosexual, if i betray my wife, if my wife betrays me and all you can imagine.

it's a problem? Maybe....

Big-Data are very incredible opportunity for Companies to improve their products and their process , if we analize this matter in terms of “productivity” , there only are reasons to think they are the best solution of business in the world.

Investment companies can predict the market unsteadiness, invest better and create a new interesting product for people.

Food companies can take out of the oven a new best donut with more sugar and fat... because Big Data say : "87% of people buy sugar and fat"

http://firewireblog.com/2012/06/01/today-friday-june-1st-is-national-donut-day/

Ok, it's a joke, but Big Data really can generate risks accentuating the difference between "want" and "need" in the market and also in politic.

If in the market we can accept this, in politics the risk about choices taken by an analysis of a Big "poll" without questions is very high.

http://www.businessinsider.com/republican-tech-rnc-data-digital-politics-2013-3

The Republican Party says "Develop and test political technologies dedicated to driving voter turnout in the 2013-2014 cycle" because in the recent re-election of United States President Mister Obama the role of technology is been more essential than before.

But words say more than they want to say... what means :"to driving voter tournout"?

If a company uses a Big Data to improve products, there is not problem, but if a party uses a Big Data to know what you wrote in Facebook or Twitter or in your blog maybe we must to worry about this.

But the greatest risk (Cispa docet) is about defense of own privacy, a concentration of info about me it's a danger, because without privacy there is not freedom.

Some agencies of US Government intend the privacy as :"persons, houses, papers, and effects." (Fourth Amendment ) but e-mail and other It personal data stored on third part servers are judged not "privacy",do you understand what this means?

Big Data are a incredible revolution in the IT sector, but the use of Big Data solicits more responsibility than ever, because a risk of exploitation of info by goverments and companies in the future will be the biggest danger for our freedom.

The War of False News...

In the last post we have showed how it's possible with false news on the web to create a dangerous politic crisis that can degenerate in demonstration , but also in riot (yesterday in Italy a crazy has shot at two soldiers in front of Government Palace).

Honestly we can say about "false news" or fakes, the problem follows the human story, we remembered Orson Wells and his “War of the Worlds” on 1938, or the aria “The calumny is a little wind” , from “The Barber of Seville” by Gioacchino Rossini...

The calumny is a little wind,

a very gentle little breeze

which numbly, softly,

lightly, kindly,

begins to whisper.

Little by little, mildly,

in a low voice, hissing,

it goes flowing, it goes buzzing;

in people's ears

it enters deftly

and makes heads and brains

stun and blow.

Getting out from the mouth

the clamour grows:

it slowly strenghtens,

it already flies from one place to another.

It seems like the thunder, like the storm

that in the depht of the forest

go whistling, grumbling,

and makes your blood run cold.

In the end it spills over and blow up,

it spreads, it doubles

and provokes an explosion

like a cannon shot,

an earthquake, a rain storm,

a general tumult

which makes the air peal.

And the miserable one who is defamed,

degraded, trampled,

scourged by the public opinion

fortunately dies.

Facebook, Twitter, and other Social Networks and search engines are full of news without validation and “who says” is not less important than “what says”. We have sure many digital friends and someone of them publishes on his profile metric tons of link, pictures, news ; sometimes they are fun, nice, likeable, sometimes they are irritating, they spreads false news, fake, malware, but our friend believes in it, without to ask if it true or not, without to search more info, so he begins to think vaccinations are only a deceit of Pharmacy Industries or Elvis is alive. We don't talk about crazy people, because this people is our colleague, maybe our teacher or brother.

This is the scenario, Internet as media grows his power and people day by day is always more zoned out.

So our lives changes and it is more dependent on web news , maybe it's time to ask ourselves :

“how it's possible to validate news and info on the Web?”

We don't want censorship, but it's not possible to allow people not vaccinates their children because they read on the web the opinions of some Guru …

then … http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-south-west-wales-22329178

Do you understand?

Ok, so much for that , it's time to find answers...

A solution in terms of It , probably is impossible... 

The best way is surely to educate , to teach people to ask the first and most important question :

“Who wrote this?”

Do you accept to be operated on your injured knee by a teacher of History? 

 Not, you demand to have a surgeon.

Why therefore people accepts an opinion about medicine by “someone” and believe it?

Why therefore people accepts an opinion about Politics by “someone” and believe it?

A few years ago it was hard to find info, we needed to read many books, to pass long time to study or in a Library, and books were honest, we knew authors.

Books cost , a publisher checked the Curriculum Vitae of an author, it was not enough to write few words, there was necessity of arguments, documents, proofs and evidences.

Today it's enough to have many "like" , it's a risk, it's a danger, because ideas and words can kill.